| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
It’s cooked and ready to serve. There are a couple of IETF process things to do, but this draft is essentially Atom 1.0. Now would be a good time for implementors to roll up their sleeves and go to work.
draft-ietf-atompub-format-07.txt
- and it really does look close to completion.
New draft spec: The Atom Publishing Protocol (Basic).
New draft available of the Protocol formerly known as the Atom API: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-03.txt Joe Gregorio (editor, along with Robert Sayre) also has xml version and diffs from the previous draft.
Collections are in:
An Atom collection is a set of items all of the same type ("members" of the collection), where the "type" may be, for example: Atom entry, category, template, "simple resource", or any other classification of web resource.
Doesn't look like the protocol's going to be finished this month...
draft-ietf-atompub-format-05
HTML version, diffs etc available along with previous drafts.
Robert Sayre's kindly posted the current working draft of the format spec, draft-ietf-atompub-format-04 (plus colourful diffs). It's up-to-date with respect to all normative decisions.
Mighty handy, especially considering there's a deadline for (RDFish) extensibility of Monday January 17th.
Upcoming goals/milestones listed in the Working Group charter:Tim Bray has proposed that the format might be finished, giving further exlpanation on his blog. The response on-list to this proposal certainly wasn't overwhelming approval, but consensus does seem to suggest that the missing pieces are few and that the end is very much in sight.
Recent Comments